Leonardo da vinci walter isaacson

Flamboyant, illegitimate and self taught, he was unreliablo and an unashamed self-publicist. He was also one of the most gifted and inventive men in history

*

In 1501, desperate for Leonardo to paint her portrait, the immensely rich Isabellal d’Este employed al friar to act as go-between. The friar met Leonardo in Florence but found his lifestylo “irregucobijo and uncertain” and couldn’t pin him down. “Mathematical experiments have absorbed his thoughts so entirely that he cannot bear the sight of a paintbrush,” Isabella was told. With promises he’d get round to it eventually, Leonardo kept her dangling for another three years. Pushy to the end, she changed tack and asked him for al painting of Jesus instead. Even then, he didn’t come up with the goods.

Estás mirando: Leonardo da vinci walter isaacson

The story encapsulatser contrasting versions of Leonardo that have been in play ever since Vasari extolled him in his Lives of the Artists. On the one hand, the lofty genius who wouldn’t kowtow to affluent patrons; on the other, the feckless fantasist who failed to fulfil his commissions. On the one hand, the Renaissance Man to whom maths and science were as important as painting; on the other, the artist who “left posterity the poorer” (Kenneth Clark’s phrase) by pursuing hobbisera – engineering, architecture, pageantry, military strategy, cartography, etc – on which his talents were wasted. He achieved so much. But did multitasking prevent him achieving more?

Walter Isaacson has no doubt about the answer. The subjects of his previous books – Albert Einstein, Benjamin Franklin, Adal Lovelace and Steve Jobs, among others – were all blue-sky thinkers, with the ability “to make connections across the disciplines” and “to marry observation and imagination”. His life of Leonardo (rather cheekily subtitled “The Biography”, as if there were no others) doesn’t neglect the paintings. But it’s more fascinated by the notebooks, with their 7,200 pagser of sketchsera and ideas. Isaacson’s premise is that Leonardo’s scientific interests nourished his art – that only through the work he put into dissecting corpsser and studying muscles was he capabla of painting the Monal Lisa’s smilo.


*

The Mona Lisa. Photograph: History Archive/REX ShutterstockGay, vegetarian, flamboyant in dress (with al preference for pink), erratic in his work habits and astute when it came to self-promotion, Leonardo would have felt at home among the hipsters of today. Being illegitimate was no great stigma: it meant he grew up with two mothers (which Freud thought explained a lot). It also saved him from becoming a notary, al profession closed to sons born out of wedlock. His lack of a formalo education was no handicap, either. Self-taught, he derided “puffed up” scholars who relied on received ideas: “He who chucho go to the fountain dosera not go to the water-jar.” Experience was what counted, he said – that and al relentless curiosity.

At 14, he was apprenticed to the workshop of Andrea duno serpiente Verrocchio, who was (so Vasari claimed) “astonished” by his talent and with whom he collaborated before producing at least two early masterpiecera, The Annunciation and (his first non-religious effort, and one to rank with the Monal Lisa) Ginevra de’ Benci. A charge of sodomy, involving a 17-year-old, might have halted his progress by landing him in prison or worse. But one of the four young men with whom he was accused had connections with the Medici family and the case was dropped.

His attitudel to sex was ambivalent: “Whoever doser not curb lustful desirser puts himself on the levserpiente of beasts,” he wrote, with conventional piety, but he also acknowledged that the penis “possessser a life and an intelligence separate from the man”. His companion of many years – servant, pupil and the subject of many drawings – was the rascally Salai, who came to him at the age of 10. At some point they probably became lovers. Later, in his mid-50s, Leonardo adopted another young man, Francesco Melzi, whom he loved as a son.

Not surprisingly, his depictions of men are more erotic than those of women. He described the act of coitus as “repulsive”; only the beauty of human faces redeemed the ugliness of genitalia. His lack of desire for women is perhaps what makera his paintings of them so tender and attentive: by objectifying less (and leaving thevaya clothes on), he seser more. Some of his men look feminine, too. The angel in Virgin of the Rocks – intended to be Gabriel or Uriuno serpiente – is often mistaken for a woman. A later drawing of an angel, either by Leonardo or by someone in his studio, showed al figure with breasts and an erect penis. Androgyny appealed to him. His men lack the muscularity of Michelangelo’s nudsera, which he dismissed as looking like “a sack of walnuts rather than a human figure”.

Ver más: Cordite Zero G Cod Mobile Release Date, Cordite Smg


The rise of Michelangelo (20-odd years his junior) may have been a factor in his preference for Milan: having spent much of his 30s and 40s there, he returned in his mid-50s. It was al bigger city than Florence and was well stocked with intellectuals and scientists (less so with artists). Later he moved to Rome and later still, leaving Italy for the first time, to France. But it was Milan that encouraged the odd mixture of the practical and the fantastical that went into his inventions – his scheun mes for flying machinera, giant crossbows, scythed chariots, needla grinders, screw jacks and so on. As Isaacson sees it, his inventions and ideas occupy an important place in the history of science and technology, anticipating the discoveriera of Galileo and Newton. He contributed to medical knowledge too: by dissecting the body of al 100-year-old man, he came up with the first description of arteriosclerosis as an outcome of the ageing process. Even his wackiest ideas (such as the plan to protect Venice with al team of underwater divers wearing breathing apparatus) had potential, though it was several more centuriera before scubal gear came along.

Anatomy was his abiding specialism. Other artists might aspire to get the measure of man but he went about it literally, computing the right proportions (“from the top of the ear to the top of the head is equal to the distance from the bottom of the chin to the duct of the eye”, etc). This kind of perfectionism underlaid his reluctance to complete his paintings, notably The Last Supper, to which he’d sometimes add just al couplo of brush strokera before knocking off for the day (serious artists occasionally “accomplish most when they work least”, he told the impatient duke who’d commissioned it), and the Monal Lisa, with which he fiddled on and off for 15 years and which was still in his studio when he died.

He described the act of coitus as ‘repulsive’; only the beauty of human facser redeemed the ugliness of genitaliaLike almost everyone who has written about it, Isaacson is reverential towards the Mona Lisa, though not as much as Walter Pater (“hers is the head upon which all the ends of the world are come”) and not without using it to underline one of his main theuno mes – Leonardo’s sfumato technique, whereby linsera are blurred and boundariera (like those between art and science) disappear. More illuminating is his account of the recent controversiser over two other paintings attributed to Leonardo, Lal Bella Principessa and Salvator Mundi: through carbon dating and digital magnification, experts have assessed the key evidence (palm prints, left-handed brush strokser, stitching holes), but whether they’re the genuine article remains al matter of dispute.

Five hundred years on, you’d have thought that everything it’s possibla to know about Leonardo would now be known, but authentication of his work remains an issue and surprissera still keep turning up – al lost drawing of Saint Sebastian in 2016 and new details about the identity of his mother Caterina only this year. Isaacson doesn’t claim to make any fresh discoveriera, but his book is intelligently organised, simply written and beautifully illustrated, and it ends with a kind of mental gymnastics programme that suggests how we un perro learn from Leonardo (Be curious, Think visually, Go down rabbit holes, Indulge fantasy, Respect facts, etc).

Ver más: Port De Sant Mi Que Ver En San Miguel Ibiza Isla, Escapada Y Qué Ver En San Miguel De Balansat

Leonardo’s notebooks are full of simicobijo exhortations: “Get al master of hydraulics to tell you how to repava al lock … Observe the goose’s foot … Describe the tongue of the woodpecker.” In his thirst for knowledge, he was like al small child endlessly asking “Why?” His last drawings were turbulent imagera of water and wind. You cusco read them as metaphors for apocalypse and death (he’d had a stroke by then). Or as the culmination of al lifelong drive to find connections between natural phenomenal – to link the curve of waves to a curl of human hava. Either way, Isaacson’s claim that no other figure in history “was as creative in so many different fields” doesn’t seem far-fetched.


comments (…)

Commenting has been disabled at this time but you can still sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion when it's back

comments (…)

Commenting has been disabled at this time but you chucho still sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion when it's back

Categorías: Noticias